A solution exists whereby some homeowners can install solar energy systems that maintain the appearance of the neighborhood.
Consider a new Rule that says standard solar arrays are permissible on the roof planes defined on a map and specified in writing. Shade analysis has no bearing. These are the roof planes on which solar panels can be reasonably mounted with minimal visibility from the street.
With the adoption of this Rule, the map locks in those vetted roof planes as the limit of solar arrays. Admittedly, some homes remain ineligible for solar arrays, and some homes may be eligible but are permitted an insufficient amount of available rooftop to go solar. Any modification of the map would require a Rule change per Bylaw.
------------------------------------
Homeowners increasingly seek the benefits of solar energy systems. However, many people object to the unfamiliar and discordant appearance of solar panels on the fronts of houses. We propose the Board reconcile the desire to benefit from solar energy with the desire to maintain villa appearances. Roof surfaces not visible from the street should be eligible for solar panels, provided other standards are met.
Issues related to considering a Rule change:
Solar installations will generate renewable energy, increase home values, improve air quality, lessen the impact of carbon on all of creation, facilitate energy independence, and show community leadership.
As solar arrays emerge as critical home infrastructure of the future, the HOA should embrace home improvements that benefit others without being seen.
An eligibility map alone does not give permission to install solar panels. A new Rule would include restrictions that address KPVA homeowner feedback.
Merely insisting “panels are ugly” does not answer why hidden roofs should not be eligible for solar panels. It’s like asking whether a tree falling in the woods makes noise when no one is around--if something can’t be seen, is it ugly?
Multiple homeowners support a Rule change that permits some solar panels.
The proposed eligibility map (map-eligible homes-rev Nov5-1) is merely an example, whereas a Rule change would have more definitive maps.
Eligibility maps merely define the suitability of roof surfaces by virtue of their appearance from the street and back windows. The maps do not account for tree shading and other shortcomings; eligible homes are not necessarily viable candidates for solar.
A Rule should not judge how people invest. Whether one agrees with solar as an investment vehicle is not reason to prohibit people from investing in solar.
A homeowner's age is not a reason to prohibit solar panels.
The Comments are excerpted from the KPVA Annual Meeting, Board Meetings, Solar Panel Committee communications, homeowner email, phone calls, and curbside chats.
Comments